badminton can be played as singles or doubles?
badminton can be played as singles or doubles?
Accept you ever wondered if professional players play both the singles and doubles disciplines? Nosotros have seen some examples of this only only in the context of exhibition matches. The Yonex Legends badminton initiative has shown us glimpses of singles players such as Taufik Hidayat and Peter Gade playing doubles matches.
Back in 2017 Lee Chong Wei and Lin Dan also took on Fu Haifeng and Cai Yun in a doubles match. Full video beneath if you have 45 minutes to spare!
Even though it looks similar Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei are holding their ain against the 2012 Olympic Champions, had this been a serious match, I'one thousand pretty sure they would have been browbeaten quite convincingly.
These events are obviously a great promotion for the sport and great fun for the spectators. All the same, the question that I remember is relevant for this article is: "can professional players be successful in both disciplines?"
Can Players Be Successful In Both Singles and Doubles?
Both singles and doubles are ordinarily played by most aspirational young players. Nearly all players have their roots in singles in some class or another. The reason being that footwork is often taught through training in the singles bailiwick. A singles courtroom is also often used to train fitness and to ameliorate retrieving skills. In the same way, playing doubles is frequently a method of preparation used for singles players to develop certain skills such equally reactions.
Therefore, professional person players can play both disciplines to a very loftier standard. However, it's my opinion that players cannot easily alter disciplines and achieve the same success in an area that is not their master forcefulness.
For example, Lee Chong Wei's double'due south game is extremely good. Even so, if he swapped to doubles midway through his career, he might have some success, merely it unlikely he would exist as successful as he is as a singles thespian. Likewise, many doubles players would struggle to reach the same heights if they switched to singles.
There are many reasons for this so I'll go through a few below to explain why this is the case.
Natural Ability
All people have natural talents. In badminton terms, a player's natural affinity for the sport will prevarication in doubles or singles. Of course, this is bailiwick to the coaching you receive and how yous are guided past your coaches. Given the right age, support, training and environment someone who is naturally a good singles actor tin go a world-form doubles actor. So information technology'south non prepare in stone. It's just what the player is naturally drawn to.
Just at the near bones level, if a player shows promise in singles, it is logical to nurture that talent as their potential is greater than in doubles. Likewise, their peers might have the equivalent potential in doubles. Therefore the singles player may not be able to attain the aforementioned standard every bit their peers in doubles and vice-versa. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Lee Yong Dae is a great instance of this. Early in his career, he played singles but never really made an impact. After he specialised in doubles, history was made. His natural badminton affinity towards doubles is clear for anyone to meet, having been so successful over the years.
Specialisation
If we go dorsum a few generations, it was common to see players playing both singles and a doubles discipline. Sometimes all three! Park Joo Bell, for example, currently holds the South Korean national record of 103 consecutive wins in men'southward singles from 1981 to 1984 (Wikipedia), and too is a doubles legend both in mixed and men's. However, nowadays, it's much rarer (if ever!) to see players play both singles and doubles in professional person tournaments.
This probable to be because the game has evolved and so much from those days, becoming faster, with the demands of each discipline being very dissimilar. Now we run into players specialising in i or the other. This is likely to be based on the natural ability each player possesses as above.
When you specialise in one bailiwick over many years, it's probably going to be difficult to break into a different subject that other players accept been putting the same try into. It'southward similar to learning an instrument. If one person plays the piano and the other violin, and they swap instruments, they might be able to read the music but it will be hard to replicate the quality that the other tin produce on their respective instrument. Information technology would have time to get to a decent level. Something athletes simply don't always have given the age factor in sports.
Fitness
Office of how badminton has evolved that is the fitness levels required of both disciplines is drastically dissimilar. Singles requires a higher level of endurance than doubles. Conversely, doubles requires greater stamina. In either instance, both crave extremely conditioned bodies tailored to each discipline. This is role of the reason playing doubles and singles in the aforementioned tournament is non really seen.
We've seen what happens when doubles players try to play singles. Information technology's exhausting! It's a completely different game. The rallies are longer, yous accept to cover the whole courtroom and opponents seem to become everything back. At the professional level, even though they are incredibly fit, the height doubles players would struggle to play singles confronting lower ranked singles players as their fitness is tailored to a completely different game.
Conversely, information technology might be a petty easier for singles players to play doubles as they are covering a piddling less of the courtroom. All the same, are they able to maintain the footstep and explosiveness consistently for potentially three games? This is something they won't be used to. The game is much faster and requires a more than conditioned anaerobic system.
And so all in all, whichever field of study they play, they, of course, are going to take an excellent base level of fitness. Yet, the fact that their fettle becomes tailored to their preferred subject field ways that players might struggle to be successful in both singles and doubles.
Skill Set
Both doubles and singles require significantly different skills. Although the basic skills of both singles and doubles players volition be very skilful (for example, footwork), some skills that singles players possess might non be effective to doubles and vice-versa. For example, singles players often have very precise net shots. Information technology's relatively rare that their opponents will take the shuttle off the top of the tape equally they have to consider the rest of the court.
Yet, in doubles, the frontcourt player can take these one-half chances much more oftentimes considering they can rely on their partner in the rear court to embrace whatsoever replies. For this reason, nets shots are far less common in doubles. Therefore the singles players force here tin't exist utilised in the same way.
On the other hand, doubles players might struggle with the footwork required of singles. They are so used to playing on a "smaller" court as their partner covers half the court in theory. If yous watch the to a higher place video again of Peter Gade and Lee Yong Dae, detect how Lee Yong Dae struggles on his backhand and at the front of the court, while Peter Gade always seems to have much more than fourth dimension to play the shot. Peter'due south footwork, at least from a unmarried's perspective is superior, as that's his speciality.
Partnerships
The hardest thing about playing doubles at the highest level is probably building chemistry with a partner. It would exist hard for a singles histrion to move into doubles and discover that relationship with another player. Oft information technology can take several years of playing with each other before the partnership becomes established. Even if the singles player had all the necessary skills to play doubles, this would exist a barrier for them.
It would exist easier if we took the opposite scenario and had a doubles histrion who had the skills to play singles as they practice not demand to consider anyone else.
Tactics
This is probably not as of import as the above as tactics can be learned. Information technology'southward how those tactics are implemented which might be restrictive when combined with the other factors to a higher place.
Decision
It would not be easy present for a professional player to play both singles and doubles at an elite level. Although at that place's no doubting that players are capable of playing both at a high level, it's probably not likely that they could play i to the aforementioned standard every bit their primary field of study. The fact that so many players now specialise, signals to me that the differences betwixt the ii disciplines have become so great, to a point where the training, fettle levels and skill set no longer compliment both due to how the game has evolved over the years.
Please consider subscribing to my blog for more great badminton content and make certain to follow me on Instagram and Facebook for other posts and updates!
If yous want 15% off Alien Pro'southward awesome looking badminton grips – click here and utilize the lawmaking "shuttlesmash" at check out! It will assist support this website and enable me to provide you with more than badminton content!
| Original content here is published nether these license terms: | X | |
| License Type: | Read Only | |
| License Abstract: | Y'all may read the original content in the context in which it is published (at this spider web accost). No other copying or use is permitted without written understanding from the author. | |
badminton can be played as singles or doubles?
Posted by: metoyerhereterving.blogspot.com
0 Response to "badminton can be played as singles or doubles?"
Post a Comment